I’m working on a management question and need guidance to help me understand better.

Management ⇒ Human Resource Management ⇒ Leadership this is a human resource management kindly give your best in it

Assignment Brief Academic Year 2020-21 Internal approval: Pia Carnegie, 25/9/20 1 Assignment task You are to select an organization and critically analyse and evaluate the leadership and management, assessing the effectiveness of these in relation to the organization’s overall performance. This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes: 1. Understand and critically evaluate contemporary theories and models of management and leadership 2. Develop and demonstrate effective leadership skills 3. Analyse the significance and impact of leadership performance in relation to overall business performance Task requirements Further Support You are to write a professionally formatted 2,500-word, +/-10%, business report that addresses the task set above and detailed below. 1. Using appropriate academic theory, models and professional sources, you are to analyse and evaluate the leadership and management of the organization in order to classify and compare academic theory with professional practice. 2. You are then required to assess the impact of the leadership and management in relation to its overall performance drawing upon business performance metrics as required from a wide cross section of business performance analysis. Note, comparison and benchmarking to ‘best in field’ or Module code and title: MG629 Developing Leadership and Management Skills Module leader: Harpreet Kaur Assignment No. and type: CW1: 2,500 word +/- 10% Leadership evaluation report. Assessment weighting: 70% Submission time and date: Tuesday 11th May 2021 before 2.00pm. Target feedback time and date: 3 Weeks after submission deadline 2 ‘best in class’ is strongly recommended in order to provide context and comprehension of the data used. Organizations should ideally be selected based on the sector the student wishes to enter as a graduate and provide access to enough research material and data to enable completion of the task. Note, films, interviews, documentary’s, podcasts as well as news, research reports, books and case studies can all be used as part of the organizational research but, this is not a definitive list and the student is strongly encouraged to be creative and original in any primary and secondary research activities used to gather insight in to the organizations leadership and management. Suggested structure, headings and word count: Front cover Executive summary Content page Introduction to report and outline of chosen organization (300 words) Analysis and comparison of leadership and management (800 words) Key performance metrics of organizational sector/market/industry (300 words) Organizational leadership and management performance. (800 words) Conclusion (300 words) Reference pages Appendices  This assessment takes the format of a 2,500-word, +/-10%, maximum of 20 pages from introduction to recommendation, professionally produced report that would be suitable for use in the boardroom of a FTSE100 company. You are to complete the task set. The report must apply models and theoretical concepts and be supported by evidence, with references, from reputable sources throughout.  You should also refer to contemporary data sources as well as market data insight from sources such as CIPD, ILM, McKinsey, Harvard Business Review and other such reputable sources including content drawn from the core texts and lecture series.  Front cover, executive summary, contents page, reference pages and appendices are NOT included in either the page count or the word count that have been allocated. Words used in tables, charts, diagrams are also NOT included in the word count. Note we do not expect to see any Wikipedia, Investopedia, Business Balls, Slide Share, and Essays4U, Term Papers or other spurious non-academic non-reputable sources within your work or in the reference list. Font size should be 11 with single line spacing. Reference list should be presented in the Harvard format along with in text referencing and there is a maximum of 4 pages allocated to appendices should you need them. Referencing and research requirements Please reference your work according to the Harvard style as defined in Cite Them Right Online (http://www.citethemrightonline.com). This information is also available in book form: Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2019) Cite them right: the essential reference guide. 11 th edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Copies are available via the University library. 3 Research should use journals and texts sourced through the university e-learning resources database and professional journals/resources only. The use of spurious and non-core materials and references will be investigated and, if necessary, referred to the university academic misconduct panel. How your work will be assessed Your work will be assessed on the extent to which it demonstrates your achievement of the stated learning outcomes for this assignment (see above) and against other key criteria as defined by your programme team. See marking criteria grid provided below for how each element/task of the assessment will be marked and the corresponding weighting of marks for each element/task required. Wgt A 70%+ B 60-69% C 50-59% D 40-49% E and F <40% Knowledge & Understanding: 10% Demonstrates an excellent appraisal of the organization’s situation. Demonstrates a clear appraisal of the organization’s situation. Demonstrates some level of appraisal of the organization’s situation. Demonstrates a superficial appraisal of the organization’s situation. Answer shows no summary of an organisation’s situation. Knowledge & Understanding: 25% Demonstrates excellent understanding of the topic, objectivity and reference to theory. Provides appropriate level of additional research including use of benchmarks. Demonstrates clear understanding of the topic, objectivity and reference to theory. Provides some research including benchmarks. Basic level of understanding of the topic, some reference to theoretical knowledge. Provides small amount of research, benchmarking may be limited or missing. Demonstrates only superficial understanding, theory limited or absent. Provides limited research, benchmarking may be limited or missing. Answer shows no application of theory and models. Analysis: 25% Excellent analysis of the models and concepts with an extensive comparison of theory to practice. Excellent explanation of the current context supported by critical application. Additional marks will be awarded for primary research that supports the work. Good analysis of the models and concepts with a good comparison of theory to practice. Good explanation of the current context supported by critical application. Additional marks will be awarded for primary research that supports the work. Some analysis of the models and concepts with some comparison of theory to practice. Effort made to explain though tended to describe. Reasonable explanation of the current context supported by critical application. Additional marks will be awarded for primary research that supports the work. Presents partial analysis of the models and concepts with minimal comparison of theory to practice. Limited attempt to explain; largely descriptive. Limited attempt made to explain the current context, and superficial application to organisation. Additional marks will be awarded for primary research that supports the work. There is no critical assessment or analysis evident. Evaluation: 30% Excellent evaluation of the models and concepts with an extensive Good evaluation of the models and concepts with a good comparison of theory to Some evaluation of the models and concepts with some comparison of theory to practice. Presents partial evaluation of the models and concepts with minimal comparison of theory Poor or no evaluation criteria have been applied critical assessment and 4 comparison of theory to practice. Excellent explanation of the current context supported by critical application. practice. Good explanation of the current context supported by critical application. Effort made to explain though tended to describe. Reasonable explanation of the current context supported by critical application. to practice. The work is largely descriptive. Limited attempt made to explain the current context, and superficial application to organisation. evaluation are missing from the work. Assignment Parameters 10% Clearly written and presented, fully and clearly referenced, and within +/-10% of the word limit Fully Harvard referenced. In general, answer is clearly written and presented, fully and clearly referenced, and within +/- 10% of the word limit. Correct Harvard referencing. Despite a small number of specific problems, answer is easy to follow with sound referencing. Answer may suffer from weak communication and presentation but is understandable with reasonably sound referencing. Weak communication and/or presentation limited effectiveness/ comprehension of argument. Poor or no referencing Submission details  This assignment should be submitted electronically. Please use the relevant Turnitin submission point in the Submit your work area in your VLE module shell.  Please ensure that your work has been saved in an appropriate file format. Turnitin will only accept the following file types: Microsoft Word, Excel or PowerPoint, PostScript, PDF, HTML, RTF, OpenOffice (ODT), Hangul (HWP), Google Docs, or plain text. Your file must also contain at least 20 words of text, consist of fewer than 400 pages and be less than 40MB in size.  You can submit your work as many times as you like before the submission date. If you do submit your work more than once, your earlier submission will be replaced by the most recent version.  Once you have submitted your work, you will receive a digital receipt as proof of submission, which will be sent to your forwarded e-mail address (provided you have set this up). Please keep this receipt for future reference, along with the original electronic copy of your assignment  You are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic misconduct, which can be viewed on the University website: https://bucks.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/9546/Academic-MisconductPolicy.pdf. In submitting your assignment, you are acknowledging that you have read and understood these regulations  Please also note that work that is submitted up to 10 working days beyond the submission date will be considered a late submission. Late submissions will be marked and the actual mark recorded but will be capped at the pass mark (typically 40%), provided that the work is of a passing standard. Work submitted after this period will not be marked and will be treated as a non-submission. Before you submit  Please use the provided checklist below to make sure you are ‘fit to submit’ your work  We recommend you use this checklist as soon as you get this assignment brief to help you plan your work 5 Fit to Submit: Assignment Checklist This brief assignment checklist is designed to help you avoid some of the most common mistakes students make in their coursework. HAVE YOU READ THE ASSIGNMENT BRIEF? IF NOT, DO IT NOW! In it you will find details of the assessment task, word count,the assessment criteria your work is marked against, and the learning outcomes – the basis for the assessmentstrategy in each module. Students often lose marks by forgetting some of the more straightforwardelements of their assignments. We recommend that you “tick off” each of the points below as you prepare your work for submission. If you need any help, ask your tutor and / or visit https://bucks.ac.uk/students/academicadvice/assessment-and-examination TICK Have you read and understood the assessment criteria? Have you met the learning outcomes? You will lose marks and your work may even be failed if you have not. Have you demonstrated you can think and write critically in the completed work? This means you have supported your arguments/explanations appropriately e.g. using relevant academic sources and you have offered discussion points which extends your own or others’ viewpoints to make reasoned conclusions/judgements. Have you maintained an academic tone throughout your work? Is your work formal, focused, developed and clear? Have you checked that the referencing in your assignment is in line with your programme requirements? Have you proof-read your work and used spellcheck software to check your spelling and grammar? Have you checked the presentation of your work is as specified by your tutor, for example, are font size, colour,style, line spacing and margins as the tutor specified? Have you kept to the word count (or equivalent)? If you are not sure, check with your tutor. 6 Can you confirm that the work submitted is your own and not plagiarised?

If you need answers to this assignment, WhatsApp/Text to +1 646 978 1313
or send us an email to admin@shrewdwriters.com and we will reply instantly. We provide original answers that are not plagiarized. Please, try our service. Thanks